20
06 '25
Love it 2
On June 6, 2025, the Parker County Sherrif’s Department arrested a man on charges of capital murder and evidence tampering related to the death of his unborn child. He is accused of slipping abortion medication into his ex-girlfriend’s drink without her knowledge after she refused to abort their child. She lost the baby two days after the alleged incident.
The loss of this innocent life is a tragedy, and we morn with this mother who recognized the value of the life she carried and chose to protect her child against pressure to destroy him or her. The fact that the choice appears to have been taken away from her is heinous. We should pray that the facts of the case are brought out with clarity so that justice can be done.
You might ask, “How can something like this happen? Don’t you have to go to a doctor to get the abortion pill?” A few years ago, yes, you would have to visit a doctor in-person to receive abortion medication. An in-person visit is necessary to rule out certain risk factors, but abortion advocates saw an opportunity during the pandemic to loosen restrictions. Abortion pills via “telehealth” were legalized to reduce contact. Unsurprisingly, the rules were never put back in place. In fact, the practice of distributing these drugs online was ramped up to perpetuate abortion in states like Texas that were successful in making abortion illegal after the Dobbs decision in 2022. It is estimated that 2,800 Texans receive the abortion pill regimen in the mail every month, despite state laws prohibiting the practice. A bill that would have required internet service providers to block access to websites selling abortion drugs in Texas failed to pass in the House during the regular legislative session.
In-person visits to a doctor are also necessary to determine that the abortion is not being forced upon the woman. That is not to say the abortion industry has always proven trustworthy to protect women against coerced abortions, far from it. However, there is certainly a better chance of preventing forced abortion when an in-person visit is required than when anyone can order the unborn-life-taking drugs online. The rolling back of limits on the abortion pill naturally leads to situations like what has been alleged in this case. Those who advocate for this lack of rules demonstrate a lack of concern for women and their children who are bound to be harmed.
Even in this awful situation, there are glimpses of light. First, the state is treating this alleged crime as what it is: capital murder. To say that the broader culture is sending mixed signals about the value of human life is an understatement. There are states where a person can be charged for manslaughter for harming a pregnant woman in a way that causes her to lose the child, but where her own decision to end the child’s life via abortion would be perfectly legal. However, the moral clarity in the acknowledgement of the child’s life in this case is to be applauded. Second, the alleged attempt to obscure evidence appears to have been thwarted. Lies can seem so pervasive that there is no way to overcome them, but the truth will win out. Again, let us pray that the truth is borne out in this case as we also pray that the truth of life at conception becomes more and more evident.
Of course, while a nefarious actor forcing abortion upon a mother is particularly egregious, a woman voluntarily choosing to take the life of her unborn child is also wrong. Our mission at Grace House Ministries is to promote life-affirming decisions by reaching out to expectant moms and dads who are considering abortion and showing them how the precious life she carries can be nurtured and supported. So far in 2025, at least 28 babies at risk of abortion have been given a chance at life because of this ministry. We will continue to do all within our power to protect the unborn, and we are grateful for those who partner with us in this work. And together, let us all work toward the goal of a society that protects and values the smallest image bearers.
*Links do not necessarily indicate an endorsement of the opinions expressed on those sites.
